Here's the full piece:

---

**UN Peacekeeping Missions Under Strain As Funding Cuts and New Threats Grow**

The United Nations is gutting its own peacekeeping force — slashing 25 percent of its blue-helmeted troops across the globe — as the United States, which bankrolls a quarter of the peacekeeping budget, pulls back billions in funding under the Trump administration's "America First" agenda. The White House's 2027 budget proposal calls for $2.7 billion in cuts to international organizations it calls "bloated," a category that explicitly includes UN Peacekeeping. A former deputy assistant secretary of state told a Carnegie Endowment seminar that the cuts mean the UN is likely to receive no peacekeeping money from the US this year. That leaves missions stretched across the most dangerous parts of Africa — from the Central African Republic to the disputed Abyei region between Sudan and South Sudan — running on fumes while the threats they face get deadlier.

Those threats now include drone warfare. In December 2025, a drone attack struck the UNISFA logistics base in Kadugli, South Kordofan, killing six Bangladeshi peacekeepers and injuring nine others. The UN condemned the strike, with peacekeeping chief Jean-Pierre Lacroix warning that attacks on UN personnel "may constitute a war crime." Bangladesh is one of the largest contributors to UN peacekeeping — its soldiers are disproportionately from the Global South, serving in conflicts fueled by weapons and interests that often trace back to wealthier nations. The attack was not an isolated event. Sudan's civil war between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces has become, in the words of Sudan researcher Eric Reeves, "increasingly a drone war, often conducted indiscriminately, especially by the RSF." Drone strikes have hit hospitals, markets, and a wedding party, killing dozens of civilians at a time.

The strain is not limited to combat zones. Contributing nations are pulling out. South Africa announced it will withdraw its more than 700 troops from the UN peacekeeping mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo before the end of 2026, ending 27 years of deployment. President Ramaphosa cited the need to "realign" the resources of South Africa's armed forces. In Lebanon, the UN Security Council voted to end the UNIFIL peacekeeping mandate after 2026, ordering a year-long drawdown. Peacekeepers there continue to face direct violence — French, Indonesian, and Ghanaian soldiers have all been killed or wounded in recent months by projectile fire and roadside explosions.

Africa bears the heaviest weight of this collapse. The continent hosts the majority of UN peacekeeping missions, and the communities those missions are meant to protect are overwhelmingly Black and poor. The UN already cut its 2026 emergency humanitarian aid budget in half, dropping from $47 billion to $23 billion. Britain — once a global champion of development aid — announced cuts that will leave Sierra Leone and Malawi with little to no health support, despite being among the poorest nations on earth with some of the highest maternal mortality rates. The US dismantled USAID and gutted PEPFAR, its own flagship HIV/AIDS program. Every one of these cuts lands hardest on African people.

The pattern is not new but it is accelerating. Western nations built an international system where African security depended on their funding, their weapons, their approval. Now those same nations are walking away — redirecting money toward wars in the Middle East, toward record-breaking $1.5 trillion military budgets, toward domestic political agendas — and leaving African nations to absorb the fallout. In South Sudan, documented killings of civilians surged 45 percent in a single month. In Sudan, three years of civil war have displaced 11 million people and counting. These are the places peacekeepers are supposed to hold the line. With fewer troops, less money, and drones in the sky that can hit a hospital ward, that line is breaking.

The deeper question this moment forces is one of self-determination. If the security of African nations depends on whether a budget office in Washington decides to write a check, then it was never real security to begin with. The African Union has pushed for greater continental ownership of peacekeeping for years, but the resources to back that up remain thin. What is clear is that the current arrangement — where African soldiers die in African conflicts funded by foreign powers who can pull the plug at any time — is failing the people it claims to serve.

Drone warfare, slashed budgets, and troop withdrawals are converging at the worst possible time. The communities caught in the middle of these conflicts — in Darfur, in Abyei, in eastern Congo, in South Sudan — are not abstractions. They are families, children, elders. And the international system that was supposed to protect them is telling them, in the clearest terms, that they are not the priority.

*